The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PZZA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PAG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | ALV | PSMT | PZZA | PAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 64 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 94 | 100 (highest) | 75 | 59 |
| Pricing power | 29 (highest) | 18 | — | 28 |
| Returns on capital | 70 | 53 | 96 (highest) | 56 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 62 | 100 (highest) | 48 | 80 |
| Capital allocation | 68 | 56 | 40 | 99 (highest) |
| 62% above value if growth stopped today | 372% above value if growth stopped today | 9% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 16% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $8.8B | $5.7B | $996M | $14.3B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |