The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AMBO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
PLAY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
| Measure | AMBO | MOD | ACCS | PLAY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 58 | 59 (highest) | 58 | 58 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 82 | 92 (highest) | 55 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 91 | 15 | 99 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 49 | 22 | 66 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 65 (highest) | 55 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 78 (highest) | 71 | 60 | 64 |
| 998% above value if growth stopped today | 351% above value if growth stopped today | 55% below value if growth stopped today | 81% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $102M | $7.9B | $17.7M | $264M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |