The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AMPL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
USDW · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AMPL | RAMP | USDW | RMBS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 75 | 70 | 90 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 99 | 86 | 100 (highest) | 94 |
| Returns on capital | — | 4 | — | 20 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 | 100 (highest) | 78 | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 100 (highest) | 44 | 86 |
| No price data | 1227% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 418% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.1B | $2.3B | Not reported | $10.3B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |