The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AMR · Materials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PARR · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AMR | MYE | PARR | SON |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 17 | 50 | 75 (highest) | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 52 (highest) | — | 34 |
| Returns on capital | 77 (highest) | 45 | 36 | 24 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 53 | 26 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 39 | 29 | 81 (highest) |
| 48% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 189% above value if growth stopped today | 8% below value if growth stopped today | 11% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.8B | $1.2B | $3.8B | $5.7B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |