The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ANKM · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ANKM | OTEX | GTM | PSN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 89 | 64 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 70 | 100 (highest) | 97 | 40 |
| Returns on capital | — | 6 | 0 | 8 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 40 | 13 | 51 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 40 | 100 (highest) | 80 |
| No price data | Around the value if growth stopped today | 41% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 23% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $5.7B | $897M | $3.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |