The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DSFT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | APCX | CBZ | CRWV | DSFT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 92 (highest) | 60 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 83 | 20 | 100 (highest) | 88 |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 13 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 79 (highest) | 44 | — |
| No price data | 107% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $5.7M | $3.0B | $26.8B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |