The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ARMK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AIHS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ADNT · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CRWE · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureARMKAIHSADNTCRWE
Moat Score (0–100)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend80 (highest)153813
Pricing power07630 (highest)
Returns on capital8 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety455 (highest)828
Capital allocation2844 (highest)44 (highest)24
382% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data73% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$15.0B$6.1M$1.6B$6.9M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025