The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ULCC · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ARW | ULCC | DIT | DSGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 | 38 (highest) | 37 | 37 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 65 | 55 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 26 | — | 26 | 46 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 31 (highest) | 6 | 29 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 60 (highest) | 55 | 45 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 24 | 32 | 60 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 69% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 224% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.3B | $39.8M | $1.6B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |