The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ASTS · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PLNT · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ASTS | PRKA | PLNT | LTH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 63 | 67 (highest) | 65 | 60 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 58 | — | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 71 | 100 (highest) | 94 | 80 |
| Returns on capital | — | 77 | 81 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 (highest) | 73 | 6 | 77 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 25 | 80 (highest) | 60 |
| No price data | 264% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 1007% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $14.4B | $29.4M | Not reported | $9.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |