The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ATMU · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
OXM · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
BLMH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ATMU | LOW | OXM | BLMH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 | 68 (highest) | 67 | 67 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 81 | 39 | 53 | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 42 | 58 | 96 (highest) | 64 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 68 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 58 | 57 | 55 | 96 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 56 | 84 (highest) | 64 | 24 |
| No price data | 50% above value if growth stopped today | 44% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $116.5B | $580M | $2.7M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2024 |