The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ALGT · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AZZ | RUN | ALGT | ROCK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 48 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 (highest) | 70 | 60 | 32 |
| Pricing power | 36 | 86 (highest) | — | 38 |
| Returns on capital | 12 | 0 | 80 (highest) | 41 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 43 | 28 | 28 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 26 | 29 |
| 246% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 36% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $3.9B | $1.8B | Not reported | $1.4B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |