The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BIAF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BIAF | GO | MG | CHGG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 60 | 73 (highest) | 15 |
| Pricing power | — | 54 | 49 | 91 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 6 | 0 | 11 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 20 | 24 (highest) |
| No price data | 28% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 76% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $3M | $884M | Not reported | $107M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |