The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRDO · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AGGI · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BKE | MUSA | PRDO | AGGI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 73 | 74 (highest) | 74 (highest) | 73 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 66 | 85 (highest) | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 73 | 100 (highest) | — | 83 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 77 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 36 | 73 | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 58 | 68 (highest) | 62 | 50 |
| 11% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 16% above value if growth stopped today | 1450014% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $2.2B | Not reported | $1.9B | $45.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |