The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UTI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BLDR | BBWI | FC | UTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 | 55 (highest) | 54 | 54 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 31 | 49 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 39 | 69 | 97 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 79 | 100 (highest) | 38 | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 57 | 33 | 48 | 87 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 82 (highest) | 40 | 40 | 24 |
| 55% below value if growth stopped today | 58% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 3% below value if growth stopped today | 616% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $8.1B | $4.0B | $250M | $2.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |