The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WH · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CRL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
SGC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BODI | WH | CRL | SGC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 55 (highest) | 46 | 38 |
| Pricing power | 91 | — | 100 (highest) | 60 |
| Returns on capital | 10 | 47 (highest) | 18 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 2 | 0 | 19 |
| Capital allocation | 0 | 37 (highest) | 12 | 23 |
| No price data | No price data | 135% above value if growth stopped today | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $76M | Not reported | $11.2B | $194M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |