The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BOX · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BOX | HFUS | CRDO | NOW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 85 | 80 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 98 | 46 | 88 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 83 (highest) | 7 | 35 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 60 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 49 | 43 | 80 (highest) | 24 |
| 253% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | 839% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $5.6B | $50.1M | $31.5B | $148.7B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |