The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
STZ · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ASII · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BRCC | CELH | STZ | ASII |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 42 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 85 (highest) | — | 70 |
| Pricing power | 56 | 67 | 85 (highest) | 26 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 6 | 22 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 35 (highest) | 23 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 24 | 42 | 44 |
| No price data | 481% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $7.0B | Not reported | $67880 |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2023 |