The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FFLO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BNED · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
GHC · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BRWC | FFLO | BNED | GHC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 44 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 43 | — | 57 | 67 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 63 | 34 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 31 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 60 | 31 | 80 (highest) |
| No price data | 523% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 34% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $6.2M | $10.8M | $437M | $4.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |