The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CABO · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
T · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CABO | HMMR | LUMN | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 27 | 27 | 5 | 47 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 26 | 82 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 31 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 (highest) | 0 | 23 |
| Capital allocation | 47 (highest) | 24 | 44 | 27 |
| 91% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | Around the value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $212M | $7.6M | $6.5B | $168.9B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |