The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TZOO · Technology · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CARG | TZOO | AAPL | BHIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 83 (highest) | 83 (highest) | 83 (highest) | 83 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 95 (highest) | 81 | 85 |
| Pricing power | 80 | 99 (highest) | 63 | 84 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 94 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 40 | 75 | 44 |
| 119% above value if growth stopped today | 40% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 367% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3.0B | $55.6M | $5.07T | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |