The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GCMG · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WDLF · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CBOE | GCMG | RHLD | WDLF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 70 | 72 (highest) | 71 | 70 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 91 (highest) | 72 | 50 | 80 |
| Pricing power | 53 | — | 88 (highest) | 81 |
| Returns on capital | 46 | 88 | 100 (highest) | 18 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 46 | 75 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 80 (highest) | 44 | — |
| 247% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 897% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $32.2B | $2.5B | $1.0B | $2.2M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2022 |