The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CBRL · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AIRO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RMTG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NRC · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCBRLAIRORMTGNRC
Moat Score (0–100)5051 (highest)5050
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend36596066 (highest)
Pricing power100 (highest)9462—
Returns on capital620—100 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety1855 (highest)55 (highest)30
Capital allocation3444 (highest)244
192% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data39% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$1.5B$172M$494025$478M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025