The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CCK · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
VTOL · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CCK | HUBG | GNRC | VTOL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 54 | 66 | 36 | 84 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 17 | 60 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 52 | 30 | 74 (highest) | 10 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 24 | 67 (highest) | 34 | 32 |
| Capital allocation | 76 | 80 (highest) | 55 | 80 (highest) |
| 157% above value if growth stopped today | 100% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 126% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $13.4B | $3M | Not reported | $1.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |