The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SWK · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CHEF | LFUS | ATI | SWK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 | 32 | 95 (highest) | 35 |
| Pricing power | 43 | 63 (highest) | 1 | 47 |
| Returns on capital | 5 | 34 | 47 | 68 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 15 | 36 | 42 (highest) | — |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 43 | 24 | 17 |
| 904% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 558% above value if growth stopped today | 163% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $3.9B | Not reported | $26.9B | $14.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |