The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CHSCL · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CHSCL | ST | AVT | GNLN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 23 | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 23 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 28 | 37 (highest) | 10 |
| Pricing power | 7 | 53 (highest) | 24 | 6 |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 17 (highest) | 13 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 27 | 0 | 5 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 56 (highest) | 19 | 40 | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | 36% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $7.5B | $1.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |