The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CHTR · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CHTR | MGAM | ROKU | IRDM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 35 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 30 | 60 | 83 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | 64 | 9 |
| Returns on capital | 11 (highest) | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 39 |
| Capital allocation | 37 | 24 | 24 | 46 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $27937 | $21.0B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |