The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CLX · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CLX | CF | MTDR | CDE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 | 62 (highest) | 61 | 61 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 56 | 64 | 76 (highest) | 70 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 23 | 100 (highest) | 65 |
| Returns on capital | — | 77 (highest) | 61 | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 60 | 82 | 45 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 57 | 64 (highest) | 24 | 60 |
| 124% above value if growth stopped today | Around the value if growth stopped today | 21% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $11.5B | $20.7B | $7.4B | $13.8B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |