The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CMG · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LOPE · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CMG | CTAS | LOPE | FAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 89 (highest) | 89 (highest) | 89 (highest) | 89 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 100 (highest) | 84 | 92 |
| Pricing power | — | 77 | — | 78 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 97 | 92 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 90 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 95 (highest) | 88 | 73 | 76 |
| 203% above value if growth stopped today | 424% above value if growth stopped today | 60% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 322% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $41.4B | $83.0B | $3.8B | $54.0B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |