The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CMP · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GORO · Materials · Not rated

Not enough comparable filing data to score at least four of the five filters, so no composite is published. No composite: 5 components abstained (businessTrend: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend.; pricingPower: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power.; returnsOnCapital: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital.; balanceSheet: No balance-sheet data available to score safety.; capitalDiscipline: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline.).

DUNXF · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

LXU · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureCMPGORODUNXFLXU
Moat Score (0–100)18 (highest)—18 (highest)17
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend44—2050 (highest)
Pricing power21 (highest)——0
Returns on capital0—04 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety0—28 (highest)12
Capital allocation24 (highest)—24 (highest)20
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$945MNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNot ratedNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025—FY2020FY2025