The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNS · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ENDI · Other · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
VRTS · Other · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SF · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CNS | ENDI | VRTS | SF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 79 | 83 (highest) | 81 | 78 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 | 50 | 74 | 79 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 100 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | — | 89 | 88 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 78 |
| Capital discipline | 39 | 80 (highest) | 60 | 69 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 49% above high estimate | No price data | 70% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $4.2B | — | $1.1B | — |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 |