The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNTM · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CNTM | EAF | WLFC | LFUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 15 | 85 (highest) | 32 |
| Pricing power | 36 | 23 | 48 | 63 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 80 (highest) | 0 | 34 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 0 | 36 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 64 | 77 (highest) | 43 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $903M | $192M | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |