The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

COHR · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

INSP · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

KROS · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SPRO · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCOHRINSPKROSSPRO
Moat Score (0–100)56 (highest)56 (highest)56 (highest)56 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend90 (highest)857265
Pricing power5899 (highest)——
Returns on capital15 (highest)0914
Balance-sheet safety—73100 (highest)100 (highest)
Capital allocation60 (highest)244444
1642% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$45.4B$2.0B$216M$63.2M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025