The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CRAI · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ASO · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | CRAI | IT | CTAS | ASO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 87 | 88 (highest) | 87 | 86 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 95 (highest) | 89 | 78 |
| Pricing power | — | 97 (highest) | 77 | 54 |
| Returns on capital | 93 | 90 | 92 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 61 | 56 | 90 | 97 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 88 | 100 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 20% above high estimate | 32% below high estimate | 217% above high estimate | 54% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $1.1B | $9.9B | $81.3B | $3.1B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |