The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CRL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
WH · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CRL | UAA | WH | BODI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 46 | 13 | 55 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 77 | — | 91 |
| Returns on capital | 18 | 8 | 47 (highest) | 10 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 2 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 12 | 50 (highest) | 37 | 0 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 135% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 1656% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $11.2B | $3.0B | Not reported | $76M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |