The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
VSTD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CVU | VSTD | DXLG | UA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 70 (highest) | 18 | 13 |
| Pricing power | 0 | — | 68 | 77 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 83 (highest) | 0 | 12 | 8 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 24 | 50 (highest) |
| 25% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | 1055% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $65M | Not reported | Not reported | $2.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2026 | FY2026 |