The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CVV · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

KOSS · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GEO · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AIRT · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCVVKOSSGEOAIRT
Moat Score (0–100)30 (highest)30 (highest)30 (highest)30 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend55207895 (highest)
Pricing power1151 (highest)
Returns on capital4011 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)00
Capital allocation252431 (highest)24
No price data547% above value if growth stopped today137% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$48.9M$35.5M$4.2B$73.2M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026