The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DIS · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CXDO | LTH | GSAT | DIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 58 | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 58 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 85 | 60 | 93 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 81 | 80 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 0 | 0 | 20 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 77 | 95 | 78 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 60 (highest) | 44 | 41 |
| 707% above value if growth stopped today | 961% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 436% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $175M | $9.0B | $157.4B | $210.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |