The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

D · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TLN · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SPRU · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

QRHC · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureDTLNSPRUQRHC
Moat Score (0–100)2324 (highest)2323
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend605063 (highest)50
Pricing power——28 (highest)12
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety00028 (highest)
Capital allocation3144 (highest)2424
147% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data6% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$55.9B$16.2B$23.8M$23.9M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025