The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CTRN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DLTI | AUC | CTRN | DLTH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 | 37 (highest) | 36 | 36 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 13 | 33 (highest) | 21 | 15 |
| Pricing power | 60 | 70 | — | 88 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 34 | 45 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 51 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 53 (highest) | 24 | 40 | 6 |
| No price data | No price data | 808% above value if growth stopped today | 782% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $22.8M | $93.6M | $525M | $145M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2026 | FY2026 |