The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

DNLI · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

QUCY · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MRNA · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BEAM · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureDNLIQUCYMRNABEAM
Moat Score (0–100)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend60 (highest)201560 (highest)
Pricing power94 (highest)70
Returns on capital0010 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)2855 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital discipline2433 (highest)2424
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$3.6B$11.1M$22.7B$2.7B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025