The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

DOW · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CMP · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

LXU · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MDU · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureDOWCMPLXUMDU
Moat Score (0–100)1718 (highest)1717
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend154450 (highest)25
Pricing power121 (highest)0
Returns on capital045 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety0012 (highest)2
Capital discipline51 (highest)242035
Price vs. high estimate60% above high estimateNo price dataNo price data6% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate)
Market cap$21.4B$1.2BNot reported$4.3B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025