The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DSFT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DSFT | CRWV | APCX | KLIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 60 | 63 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | 88 | 100 (highest) | 83 | 74 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 6 | 41 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 0 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | — | 44 (highest) | 24 | 40 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 558% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $38.6B | $13.6M | $4.2B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |