The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DUKR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WOOF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
KLC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DUKR | WOOF | KLC | CPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 27 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 41 | 53 | 58 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 10 | 66 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | — | 5 | 33 (highest) | 17 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 1 | 0 | 40 |
| Capital allocation | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 21 |
| No price data | 15% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 981% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $11.8M | $747M | $583M | $501M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |