The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CLMB · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | EACO | XPEL | TOL | CLMB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 79 | 81 (highest) | 80 | 79 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 | 95 | 86 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 49 | 55 (highest) | 33 | 23 |
| Returns on capital | 74 | 100 (highest) | 81 | 97 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 99 | 73 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 80 | 80 | 100 (highest) | 78 |
| 107% above value if growth stopped today | 110% above value if growth stopped today | 5% below value if growth stopped today | 15% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $491M | $1.2B | $14.2B | $117M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |