The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INVU · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DASH · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EBAY | NTCT | INVU | DASH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 38 | 65 | 27 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 99 (highest) | 99 (highest) | 86 | — |
| Returns on capital | 65 (highest) | 0 | — | 6 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 46 | 73 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 52 | 62 (highest) | 44 |
| 145% above value if growth stopped today | 107% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 400% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $55.2B | $2.8B | $31.4M | $84.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |