The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AVPT · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EGAN | CRUS | AVPT | EXLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 81 (highest) | 81 (highest) | 81 (highest) | 80 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 74 | 80 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 97 | 87 | 100 (highest) | 60 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 97 | — | 59 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 73 | 100 (highest) | 89 |
| Capital allocation | 51 | 77 | 44 | 94 (highest) |
| No price data | 37% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 185% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $142M | $5.5B | $3.0B | $5.8B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |