The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EXPD · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EME | EXPD | PLUS | EXPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 78 (highest) | 78 (highest) | 78 (highest) | 78 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 30 | 80 | 85 |
| Pricing power | 20 | — | 43 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 97 | 100 (highest) | 86 | 42 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 62 |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 84 | 80 | 100 (highest) |
| 364% above value if growth stopped today | 188% above value if growth stopped today | 78% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 286% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $32.6B | $26.6B | $2.5B | $34.1B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |