The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CCEL · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LEEEF · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EOLS | AXGN | CCEL | LEEEF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 60 | 44 | 70 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 92 | 98 | 99 (highest) | 46 |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | — | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 0 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 524% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $389M | $1.9B | $27.9M | $51.1M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |