The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PMNT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
NSIT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | F | AN | PMNT | NSIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 (highest) | 50 | 37 | 19 |
| Pricing power | 10 | 28 | 60 (highest) | 15 |
| Returns on capital | 72 (highest) | 53 | — | 58 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 40 (highest) | 28 | 29 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | — | 44 | 89 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 58% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $5.6B | $4.7M | $4.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |