The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MAPS · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FISV | DBX | RSKIA | MAPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 94 (highest) | 83 | 84 | 25 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 90 | 82 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 31 (highest) | 0 | 18 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 32 | 100 (highest) | 73 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 64 | 80 (highest) | 44 |
| 49% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 50% above value if growth stopped today | 122% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $25.2B | $10.0B | $178M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |